Here's a quick comparison of the resolution between two excellent fixed lens cameras, the Olympus 35 SP, and the Fuji GW690III. Both cameras have the same aspect ration, and about the same coverage and depth of field, that's why this comp will have some value if you want to know the quality you'll need for large print sizes. Of course there are other differences between the two films sizes other than just resolution potential, but this is just a quick write up until I dedicate a post to the subject.
The Olympus 35 SP has a 42mm lens, and uses 135 cartridge film, known by hobbists as "35mm" film, which isn't actually 35mm for the imaging area, but that's for another post. Image area is about 24x36mm
The Fuji GW690III has a 90mm lens and uses 120 roll film, with a size known as 6x9, but it isn't actually 6x9cm, that's also for another post. Image area is about 56x83mm
Both lenses are widely known to be extremely sharp, and have very similar coverage areas; the Fuji would be about 40-41mm converted to 135 format, so it's at a slight disadvantage for this comparison.
To sum up the two images quickly; I'm actually surprised...
I've decided on a standard aperture test scene for the camera reviews; it's the mountain scene above. I like it in that is shows different levels of detail, and it lowers the probability of focusing errors as the distance is usually at infinity, and that particular focus setting is easy to test for accuracy.
The Olympus 35 SP has been updated with the new test scene; the old ones were from color reversal film, (Fuji Velvia 100), and I didn't like the way they looked when I took them just before sunset. The new pictures really show the details much better, and the lens seems even more impressive now; I know that's probably hard to believe, but it's true, check it out yourself.
Both the Fuji GSW690III, and GW690III reviews have been updated as well with the mountain test scene, and I've included a few additional details as a result of further use; plus I tweaked the specifications section to match up better with the current review format.
Think you need a $4500 Sony A9 and expensive trick lens to take fast action shots? The photographer that caught this moment was probably using an early 1950s rangefinder, or a press 4×5 with sport finder; try using one of those today in a similar situation and see if you can come up with anything remotely usable.
I bought this weeks review camera brand new in 1989; it was a K-Mart blue light special blister-pack model and I think I paid about $45 for it. I wanted to take some pictures of a house I was renovating, and did not have any other camera available. At the time I thought I'd take a few rolls of what I needed, toss it in the drawer, and eventually it'd head to a garage sale or dumpster. When I bought it way back then I didn't think I'd be using it almost 30 years later. I still get a kick out of running a roll through it every once in a while; the technical image quality is pretty good, about the same as a top line $900 cell phone camera, but much quicker and easier to operate, and a whole lot less expensive; pick up a nice copy on ebay for less than $10, or even less at a garage sale.
Oddly, I can't seem to find a single page of information...
This amazing 1928 photo, probably taken by San Francisco Photographer Christopher Helin, shows “the new” (1928) Marmon 78 roadster in San Francisco, Ca. (most likely along the First Unitarian Church at the intersection of Franklin and Geary Streets, and around the corner from the Van Ness auto row).
I purchased this 5×7″ glass plate negative from a collector in …
I've totally updated the Zeiss Ikon Ikonta review using mostly new pictures, along with the now standard mountain aperture test scene. I've also added more information gained through additional use, and then put the whole review in the same format as the newer camera reviews.
My dad bought this camera new in 1953, and I've had it for the last 10 years or so. Using it was a chore as the shutter speeds were off quite a bit, and the focusing was out of whack so to speak. After a recent shutter cleaning and lens calibration by the famed Certo6, it now hums along nicely, and produces much higher technical quality photos than before.
If you're bored at work, how about checking out a four page B&H Photo ad from a February 1999 Popular Photography magazine? During the late 1990s the film industry was still going fairly well, but dark clouds were on the horizon. As I look through the ads, I'm amazed at the prices they were charging, and apparently getting for some of the higher end camera gear. Keep in mind these prices have been steeply discounted from high volume retailers; your local camera shop probably charged significantly more than what you see here. The swell, (and nearing the end of its life) Nikon 35Ti is $649, the newer Fuji GA645Wi is $1679, and the old, (and nearing the end of their lives) Fuji GW690III series are around $1250, which is actually much less than I would have guessed.
It's kinda fun looking through the old Photography magazines once in a while, not just for the ads, but the articles and reviews too. These pages...