Blog Archives - Page 71 of 98 - Photo Jottings

Blog

December 17 2009

12/17/09

The new Sony 28-75mm F/2.8 SAM turned in a good review, check it out if you like.  I’m unable at this point to determine whether or not it’s the same as the Konica Minolta or Tamron models, but I’ll be finding out soon, so hold off buying this lens until I do check out those less-expensive models.  The Sony…

Read more »

December 17 2009

12/17/09

The new Sony 28-75mm F/2.8 SAM turned in a good review, check it out if you like.  I’m unable at this point to determine whether or not it’s the same as the Konica Minolta or Tamron models, but I’ll be finding out soon, so hold off buying this lens until I do check out those less-expensive models.  The Sony…

Read more »

December 13 2009

12/13/09

Go check out the biased review of the Nikon D3000 at Dpreview.  They make some comparisons to the Sony A230.  I guess Nikon must be paying reviewers more than Sony.  To see what I’m talking about, look at the RAW noise comps, page 13, Sony is clearly the best at RAW high ISOs, but the reviewer makes excuses…

Read more »

December 11 2009

12/11/09

Sony 28-75mm F/2.8 SAM first thoughts: I’ve completed the APS-C review shots, and I’m just now starting on full frame shots.  I notice this lens is very similar to the Konica Minolta AF 28-75mm F/2.8 lens I reviewed a couple of years ago.  I think Tamron built that one, and this new one too.  The Sony performs pretty…

Read more »

November 30 2009

11/30/09

The Sony 16mm F/2.8 fish-eye lens review is done.  I initially thought the lens was kind of boring, but I found a way to use it that suits me.  This lens is meant for fun, and shouldn’t be used by annoying prudish people that worry about optically perfect lenses and adherence to conventional photography.   During my few weeks of …

Read more »

November 16 2009

11/16/09

I’ve finally completed the little macro lens review after a delay because of cloudy weather here is Tucson.  The Sony DT 30mm F/2.8 macro lens is very light, relatively small, and turned in a very good performance for its intended purpose—macro imaging, though the 3/4″ (19mm) working distance for 1:1 reproduction is too short for me.  It appears to …

Read more »

Scroll to Top