Full review of the Tamron SP AF 70-200mm F/2.8 Di LD (IF) macro lens for Sony.
Side view |
Backside showing baffle |
Front element |
AF/MF by sliding focus ring front and back |
Removeable tripod collar |
X-ray view |
General information and specifications.
Lens
|
A001S Tamron SP AF70-200mm F/2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro
|
Box contents
|
Front and rear caps, users manual, hood and padded soft case.
|
Cost
|
|
Build quality
|
Good
|
Additional information
|
Has autofocus to manual focus switch, which is operated by pushing or pulling the focus ring front to back.
|
Specifications below
|
|
Optical configuration
|
18 elements in 13 groups
|
Angle of view
|
34°-12° full frame, 23°-8° APS-C, measured on the diagonal.
|
Aperture
|
9 blades, curved
|
Full frame and APS-C
|
Yes, full frame and APS-C. APS-C equivalent, 105-300mm
|
Depth of field and focus scales?
|
Focus distance window, and focal length index marks at 70mm, 85mm, 100mm, 135mm, and 200mm.
|
Minimum focus, image plane to subject
|
37.1″ (943mm)
|
Minimum focus, end of lens barrel to subject
|
27.5″ (698mm)
|
Hard stop at infinity focus?
|
Yes, but not accurate in all conditions
|
Length changes when focusing?
|
No |
Focus ring turns in AF?
|
No
|
Filter size
|
77mm
|
Filter ring rotates?
|
No
|
Distance encoder?
|
Yes
|
Max magnification
|
0.32x, or 1:3.1
|
Min. F/stop
|
F/32
|
Sony teleconverter compatible?
|
No
|
Length changes when zooming?
|
No
|
Dimensions WxL (my measurements)
|
3.5″ x 7.7″ 90mm x 196mm. widest at front, just behind the hood mount.
|
Maximum extended length (my measurements)
|
7.7″ (196mm)
|
Weight bare (my scale)
|
2lbs 9oz (1154g) bare, 2lbs 15oz (1324g) with tripod collar, and 3lbs 3oz (1437g) with caps, collar and hood.
|
70mm, mild to moderate barrel distortion. |
Flat at 100mm. |
200mm, mild pincushion distortion. |
70mm F/2.8
|
70mm F/4
|
200mm F/2.8
|
200mm F/4
|
I see a pretty smooth bokeh at all apertures, although when the lens is wide open, the out-of-focus highlights become lentil shaped just off center, and look funny, see the images below.
Real bokeh shots below.
200mm, F/2.8 |
200mm, F/4 |
The top F/2.8 image illustrates what I’ve been referring to, that is, when highlight blur is just off center, it takes on a lentil shape, and can cause a “swirling” look, especially noticeable on full frame cameras. One stop down and this issue goes away. You have to have the right background and de-focus for this to show up, so it’s not something that should cause concern. See the study on Bokeh here.
70mm F/2.8
|
70mm F/4
|
200mm F/2.8
|
200mm F/4
|
Let’s check out the macro capabilities of this lens.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Full frame results using the Sony A900.
Check out the differences when using a full frame camera below. I’m only pointing out the noticeable issues as compared to the APS-C bodies, so if I don’t show it here, the results are not significantly different enough to warrant posting an additional set of images in this section.
Light fall-off
70mm F/2.8
|
70mm F/4
|
200mm F/2.8
|
200mm F/4
|
Light fall-off is stronger with full frame coverage. I see moderate levels around 200mm with a wide open aperture. Regular filters cause no additional light fall-off, although close focusing at 200mm will show a little more than at infinity.
Ghosting with full frame coverage.
70mm F/8
|
70mm F/8 sun in corner
|
200mm F/4
|
200mm F/8, sun out of shot
|
200mm F/5.6, blow out!
|
200mm F/5.6, hand used to block sun
|
I see some multi-colored blobs when the sun or super bright light are near, or inside the image. Flare problems exist more so at long zoom lengths, and can blow out almost the entire image, but using your hand to block the sun can help eliminate some of this, but not all, see the last row and the red blob on the lower left corner. All samples above show the entire image, and are not cropped.
Full image from A900 below illustrating light fall-off.
This boring full image shows the light fall-off from 200mm, F/2.8. It’s slightly noticeable, but in a scene like this just stop down the aperture a little instead of using F/2.8, ISO 200 with a shutter speed of 1/4000sec as I did here.
Full frame distortion.
Moderate barrel distortion @70mm on A900 |
Almost flat @100mm on A900 |
Moderate pincushion distortion @ 200mm on A900 |
There is moderate barrel distortion at 70mm, although it has a simple curve and is easy to fix with distortion correction tools. Around 100mm-135mm there is almost no distortion. As you zoom to 200mm you’ll find moderate pincushion distortion, also with a fairly simple curve.
The Tamron SP AF70-200mm F/2.8 Di LD (IF) macro lens is a low cost alternative to the more expensive Sony model, also tested here. Is it worth it? It all depends on what’s important to you.
Build quality is not great like the Sony, and the slot/screw drive focusing system is slow, but pretty accurate. Unfortunately, there are no focus hold or focus limiter buttons to help out, that’s the down side. On the up side, the lens performs very well optically, with relatively low distortion, good control of both axial and lateral color fringing, although color fringing is noticeable along the sides at the short end to about 135mm.
The Tamron 70-200mm F/2.8 is slightly soft wide open at all zoom lengths, although F/2.8 results become more soft as you near 200mm. However, by stopping down to F/4 the centers and mid-sections look quite sharp and are totally usable at all focal lengths. The full frame mid-sections and corners need about an extra stop to sharpen up and match APS-C results in most cases, but that’s very predictable and normal. My verdict; good image quality from F/3.5-11, and very good image quality from F/4-8.
Use thoughts; Wedding photography; it should work fine (before the booze), if you’re wanting to take pictures at a football game from the cheap seats in daylight or with good stadium lighting, the Tamron 70-200mm F/2.8 will perform well. If you’re near the sidelines trying to catch the action close by, or shooting events like high-energy rock concerts, I’d probably go for the more expensive Sony 70-200mm F/2.8 G, which has faster focusing along with a focus limiter and focus hold buttons. Bottom line; the Tamron 70-200mm F/2.8 is well worth the price if you don’t need fast focusing.