Sony’s R1 gets refined seven years later by Canon

Canon re-invents the Sony R1 seven years later, (mouse over image to see R1).  Sony came out with the fixed lens, large sensor R1 in 2005 with a lot of fanfare.  Unfortunately, the trend at that time was low-priced DSLRs.  The R1 was a great idea, at the wrong time.  Canon is trying the GX1 at the right time, with the trend solidly going to DSLR quality, in a much smaller package.

In my opinion, the Canon G1 X is the future of consumer cameras, that is, small, light-weight, using a large sensor and fixed zoom lens with image quality the same as larger DSLRs.  Who wants to carry around a heavy camera all day with two or three lenses, especially on vacation?  Not me, I’m not even using my A900 anymore for non-business use, it’s too inconvenient.

The NEX cameras (and for that matter most mirrorless cameras) are very good, but you have to buy lenses, and those lenses tend to be large and expensive.

The new Canon G1 X seems (on paper at least) to be the perfect compromise of quality and convenience.  It has a large sensor with a crop factor of 1.85x, and the built-in lens has a nice focal range of 28-112mm in full frame terms.  There’s a hotshoe, pop up flash, three stop ND filter, top-plate ±3 exposure compensation, and an articulating VGA screen just to name a few things, some of which consumer DSLRs or mirrorless cameras don’t normally have.   The trade-off is no phase detect focusing, slightly heavy at 534g, (or over 1 pound), and slow continuous shooting.

I’d prefer a slightly faster lens with a 24mm starting point, like a 24-75mm F/2.8, but that might make the camera too big.

Anyways, if the lens quality and focusing is good, I’d use something like this way more than a DSLR or even a NEX.

Canon G1 X

Tags:

  • Roberto Gardella

    It’s weird Sony didn’t decide to refresh R1, it was and still is a wonderful camera!

    • http://photojottings.com/ Kurt Munger

      Sony’s vision of the future is the NEX system; producing a new R1 type (or G1 X) camera could cause damage to the NEX sales and may be counter-productive. I think that’s also why they don’t have an enthusiast type G12 or LX5 etc to offer.

      • Roberto Gardella

        Yep, you’re right….after this reflection it’s not weird anymore….. ;)

  • Matthew Durr

    Kurt that was the first thing that came to mind when I saw this. The R1 was ahead of its time. :)

    • http://photojottings.com/ Kurt Munger

      Waaaaaaaaaaay ahead!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Andrew-Sharpe/100002960455059 Andrew Sharpe

    I loved my R1, and though the lure of the full-frame 850 became too strong in the end I still regret not keeping it. I believe it is largely because of how comfortable I felt with it that I’ve never really warmed to the 850, it’s not a bad camera, but I just don’t love it. I’m seriously considering moving to the NEX-7 when they become more available, I really don’t see the need for SLR (or SLT) technology, it was designed to solve a problem that doesn’t exist anymore.

    • http://photojottings.com/ Kurt Munger

      The only issue I see with the NEX system is the current selection of lenses, most are geared towards video, not serious still photography. Also, if you mount a large lens, it no longer makes sense. That’s why I like this little Canon, if the quality is the same, I’d rather use it.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Andrew-Sharpe/100002960455059 Andrew Sharpe

        Very true, one of the reasons I’ve not made the leap yet. I must admit you have a very strong point about the lenses. My lens of choice (so far) for the NEX-7 would have been the 18-200mm, but after reading your review, and looking at the size I’m very concerned, not only about the optical quality, but also that there is no tripod mount on the lens. I can’t imagine wanting to mount the NEX-7 body on a tripod with that lens attached!

  • Mike G

    Agree; the future cameras will be smaller then the aging DSLR. Even the SLT’s are bigger then needed when you look at the size of the NEX 7.
    I own a FF, A-700 and A55 and often leave them behind with my Canon S95 in my pocket. Size matters!

    • http://photojottings.com/ Kurt Munger

      I’m right with ya mike!

  • JP

    My personal $ limit for a camera I can’t clean the sensor on is $200. All up weight isn’t much less than an A33 and despite all the slagging of EVFs I can’t see anyone realistically preferring the OVF on this unless they are really into nostalgia for the dysfunctional. With an EVF, a wider lens and an included 5 year service contract on sensor cleaning, it would be a consideration.

    Got rid of my Fuji X10 for exactly the same reasons. No doubt Canon will sell lots of these, regardless.

    • http://photojottings.com/ Kurt Munger

      The camera will be in the local landfill in two years, so I’m not worrying about sensor dust.