Welcome to Photo Jottings! Feel free to browse the site; there’s a lot of stuff here, so starting with the site guide may be a good idea. Film lovers can start here and here. For all my lens reviews, go here. Use the search box for past homepage posts and product reviews that may not show up in the pages above.
Our next review lens is the Sony FE 'G' Master 24-70mm F/2.8. I'll be doing a 'running' review; which means I'll post sections of the review as I get them done, instead of waiting to finish the entire review before posting it. First up will be full size sample test images, and then comparisons with other lenses that I have, including the Sony FE Zeiss 24-70/4, Sony FE Zeiss 35/2.8, Sony FE Zeiss 16-35/4 and maybe the Sony Zeiss 55/1.8.
The 24-70mm F/2.8 'G' Master lens is supposed to be the sharpest mid-zoom yet from Sony, so It should be interesting to see how it performs against other lenses at the same focal lengths.
I should be able to get out some test samples within a couple of days, so check back often.
The most asked question for both of my websites is if the Sony 16-70mm (B&H, Amazon, eBay), is a decent lens. My conclusion was not two thumbs up, and I thought it was a bit pricey for the performance.
At the time of the review, (December 2013), on my old site, I couldn't post full size images, but I can here at photojottings, and I was able to find some of the original test shots with a 'set' at three different focal lengths, 16mm, 23mm and 70mm.
I've also updated the review here on this site. Remember, all updates to anything originally posted to kurtmunger.com will only show up here. The old site has not been updated for a long time, and it will not be updated anymore.
For what it's worth, the resolution along the sides are not up to my standards, which are pretty high. However, there's more to life than resolution, and this lens does have other qualities that some folks may find important.
So judge for yourself the image quality from the full size samples below...
My Dad took this Kodachrome slide of Ray Farhner's 1932 Ford Roadster pickup 'Eclipse' probably in 1960 or 1961 in Detroit. I'm not sure what the show was called by it could be either 'NHRA' 1960, or maybe 'National Champion Custom Car Show' in 1961. Farhner went on to produce more custom cars, including a hotrod 1850s funeral coach called the Boothill Express!
This little pickup won many awards, (Grand Sweepstakes winner in NHRA 1960), and was featured in all the major car magazines of the day, including Hotrod, Car Craft, Custom Rodder and a plethora of others. It's now a legendary custom Rod that has been restored, more info here.
Notice the mirror positioned on a slant under the car showing the undercarriage; the October 1960 Car Craft magazine, (with the car on the cover); the Cadillac 'teeth' on the front grill, and the hood with a body-color spot light just visible at the bottom edge. I like the pose of the couple on the left, I think it makes the image more interesting.
The photo was taken by my dad with an Aries 35 IIIL rangefinder camera (which I still have), 45mm at F/1.9, maybe 1/15s. The image is...
Check out the full size samples for full frame and APS-C inside.
I reviewed this 'a' mount lens almost ten years ago when there were no newer Sony equivalents available. However, Sony eventually come up with a Carl Zeiss 24mm /2 wide angle lens; it was very expensive at the time, ($1400) and a pretty good lens; unfortunately, I was not able to give it two thumbs up, see the review here.
Now that I've re-visited the Minolta AF 24mm F/2.8, I can see that it is actually very sharp stopped down to F/5.6-8 using an APS-C camera, and F/8-11 with full frame. It does suffer from a soft periphery at F/2.8-4, and soft extreme corners at F/5.6. Fortunately, If you can live at F/5.6 to F/11, this lens is a very good value. Current eBay prices are around $150 for a good copy.
The Minolta AF 24mm is still a good solid choice for interior work, or landscapes at F/8-11 using a full frame camera. For those using APS-C, the focal length would be about 36mm (in 135 film format).
Unfortunately, as we creep into 2018, Sony still has not produced a 24mm focal length 'FE' lens.
If you have an APS-C camera and want excellent optical qualities in this focal length, get the superb Sony CZ 24/1.8. If you're on a budget, check out the Sony pancake 16mm lens, which has the same coverage as a full frame 24mm lens.
This lens will auto focus with the all Sony mirrorless cameras using the...
The FujiFilm QuickSnap Flash, B&H, Amazon, eBay, is a 'single use,' 'throw-away' or 'disposable' camera, whichever term you prefer. Like nearly all single use cameras, it has a very simple plastic lens, manual film advance, and 27 exposures. This model comes with a flash.
These little cameras are about as easy to use as it gets for film. The film is already loaded, all you do is advance the film via thumb wheel until it won't turn anymore, then simple look through the viewfinder and take a snap. If you want a little fill flash, just push the button up on the front of the camera until the pop-up plastic piece turns red, which means the flash is ready, see pic below.
You'll see a bunch of these at weddings where the guests are encouraged to pick them up and start shooting, especially after the liquor starts to flow, then turn them in to the hosts before going home so the newlywed couple can get them developed and have some laughs later on...
Our next camera up for review is the Ansco Color Clipper; complete with flash unit! This was an eBay impulse buy, and I think it was about $50. I'm a sucker for weird cameras, especially when they're in good usable condition as this one is.
In the early 1950s when the camera was made, the "Color Clipper' name was probably chosen to try and fool people into thinking it was made specifically for color film, which was pretty new and cool back then; however, any camera will produce nice looking color pictures, even century old folders.
The Ansco Color Clipper is well build, uses readily available 120 film, and has zone focusing and double exposure prevention, not bad for an inexpensive 'outfit' back in the day.
Some of these old cameras are capable of producing pretty good prints using cheap meniscus type lenses, and my hope was that this one would be good enough for medium sized prints. To find out if it met my expectations, go to the bottom of the review; but first off, let's take a look at the camera specs...
Check out the deals on just about all Sony 'E' Camera equipment, including $50-$100 off most Sony E lenses and RX series cameras.
A few of my favorites below:
Sony A6000 with 16-50mm and 55-210mm lenses/with extra battery and carrying case for $698, I paid more than that for just my A6000!
Sony A7RII for $2398; I paid about the same for my A7R four years ago!!
The Minolta AF 300/4 (review here) is a very capable lens; it’s sharp, and maxed out in resolution at F/4 for normal shooting, and F/5.6 for test charts. Sony doesn’t currently offer any long telephoto primes for the ‘e’ mirrorless system, but you can get the exceptional ‘a’ mount Sony 300/2.8 (review here) for a …